Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Multinationals: Corporate Responsibility’ & Dictatorship

The reason why a fuller understanding of the significance of the Hitler dictatorship did not emerge in prewar democracies remains a question of enduring historical interest. This article examines the way in which Unilever, one of the earliest multinational corporations, responded to the challenges of political risk posed by the Third Reich, and how aspects of business activity that gave rise to moral issues were weighed against the need to survive commercially. The realisation that Unilever could be seen as an unwitting accomplice in the dictatorship's criminal activities seems to have come late to the company. While corporate culture reflected the values of contemporary society, multinational business was partly responsible for the failure to sound the alarm over the unique dangers inherent in National Socialism.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

i have read the article and i fount it very knowledge bassed which really comes after doing soem wrok ot it tthe writer really did his best to find out the good points from the histroy

Sohail said...

in pakistan before the arrival of multinationals there was one man show and saith culture took advantage of poor people. but today the way i see it multinationals are also doing one way or other the same. they are increasing prices every day but no one is there to ask them.

rehan said...

irfan
pakistan being a poor country where labour is available at low rates and one reasonj of establising multinationals is to reduce labour cost. even after the establishment of multinationals same rules are being practised directly or in directly i.e one man show,

Unknown said...

Umair Here
pakistan being a poor country where labour is available at low rates and one reasonj of establising multinationals is to reduce labour cost. even after the establishment of multinationals same rules are being practised directly or in directly i.e one man show